RE: [PATCH next v2 5/5] locking/osq_lock: Optimise decode_cpu() and per_cpu_ptr().

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Waiman Long
> Sent: 03 May 2024 23:14
> 
> 
> On 5/3/24 17:10, David Laight wrote:
> > From: Waiman Long
> >> Sent: 03 May 2024 17:00
> > ...
> >> David,
> >>
> >> Could you respin the series based on the latest upstream code?
> > I've just reapplied the patches to 'master' and they all apply
> > cleanly and diffing the new patches to the old ones gives no differences.
> > So I think they should still apply.
> >
> > Were you seeing a specific problem?
> >
> > I don't remember any suggested changed either.
> > (Apart from a very local variable I used to keep a patch isolated.)
> 
> No, I just want to make sure that your patches will still apply. Anyway,
> it will be easier for the maintainer to merge your remaining patches if
> you can send out a new version even if they are almost the same as the
> old ones.

I don't think any changes are needed.
So the existing versions are fine.
They applied (well my copy of what I think I sent applied) and built.
So there shouldn't be any issues.

	David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux