RE: [PATCH next 0/5] locking/osq_lock: Optimisations to osq_lock code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Linus Torvalds
> Sent: 30 December 2023 19:41
> 
> On Fri, 29 Dec 2023 at 12:52, David Laight <David.Laight@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > David Laight (5):
> >   Move the definition of optimistic_spin_node into osf_lock.c
> >   Clarify osq_wait_next()
> 
> I took these two as preparatory independent patches, with that
> osq_wait_next() clarification split into two.
> 
> I also did the renaming that Waiman asked for.

Ok, I'll try to remove them from any respin.
(Or at least put them first!)

	David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux