Re: [PATCH next 0/5] locking/osq_lock: Optimisations to osq_lock code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 29 Dec 2023 at 12:52, David Laight <David.Laight@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> David Laight (5):
>   Move the definition of optimistic_spin_node into osf_lock.c
>   Clarify osq_wait_next()

I took these two as preparatory independent patches, with that
osq_wait_next() clarification split into two.

I also did the renaming that Waiman asked for.

           Linus




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux