Re: [PATCH] virtio_net: set default mtu to 1500 when 'Device maximum MTU' bigger than 1500

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 7 May 2023 04:58:58 -0400, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, May 06, 2023 at 04:56:35PM +0800, Hao Chen wrote:
> >
> >
> > 在 2023/5/6 10:50, Xuan Zhuo 写道:
> > > On Sat,  6 May 2023 10:15:29 +0800, Hao Chen <chenh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > When VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU(3) Device maximum MTU reporting is supported.
> > > > If offered by the device, device advises driver about the value of its
> > > > maximum MTU. If negotiated, the driver uses mtu as the maximum
> > > > MTU value. But there the driver also uses it as default mtu,
> > > > some devices may have a maximum MTU greater than 1500, this may
> > > > cause some large packages to be discarded,
> > >
> > > You mean tx packet?
> > Yes.
> > >
> > > If yes, I do not think this is the problem of driver.
> > >
> > > Maybe you should give more details about the discard.
> > >
> > In the current code, if the maximum MTU supported by the virtio net hardware
> > is 9000, the default MTU of the virtio net driver will also be set to 9000.
> > When sending packets through "ping -s 5000", if the peer router does not
> > support negotiating a path MTU through ICMP packets, the packets will be
> > discarded. If the peer router supports negotiating path mtu through ICMP
> > packets, the host side will perform packet sharding processing based on the
> > negotiated path mtu, which is generally within 1500.
> > This is not a bugfix patch, I think setting the default mtu to within 1500
> > would be more suitable here.Thanks.
>
> I don't think VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU is appropriate for support for jumbo packets.
> The spec says:
> 	The device MUST forward transmitted packets of up to mtu (plus low level ethernet header length) size with
> 	gso_type NONE or ECN, and do so without fragmentation, after VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU has been success-
> 	fully negotiated.
> VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU has been designed for all kind of tunneling devices,
> and this is why we set mtu to max by default.
>
> For things like jumbo frames where MTU might or might not be available,
> a new feature would be more appropriate.


So for jumbo frame, what is the problem?

We are trying to do this. @Heng

Thanks.


>
> > > > so I changed the MTU to a more
> > > > general 1500 when 'Device maximum MTU' bigger than 1500.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Hao Chen <chenh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > >   drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 5 ++++-
> > > >   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > > > index 8d8038538fc4..e71c7d1b5f29 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > > > @@ -4040,7 +4040,10 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> > > >   			goto free;
> > > >   		}
> > > >
> > > > -		dev->mtu = mtu;
> > > > +		if (mtu > 1500)
> > >
> > > s/1500/ETH_DATA_LEN/
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > > +			dev->mtu = 1500;
> > > > +		else
> > > > +			dev->mtu = mtu;
> > > >   		dev->max_mtu = mtu;
> > > >   	}
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > 2.27.0
> > > >
>
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux