On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 10:04 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, 13 Apr 2023 14:40:25 +0800 Jason Wang wrote: > > The code used to busy poll for cvq command which turns out to have > > several side effects: > > > > 1) infinite poll for buggy devices > > 2) bad interaction with scheduler > > > > So this series tries to use sleep instead of busy polling. In this > > version, I take a step back: the hardening part is not implemented and > > leave for future investigation. We use to aggree to use interruptible > > sleep but it doesn't work for a general workqueue. > > CC: netdev missing? My bad. Will cc netdev for any discussion. Thanks > _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
