On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 6:36 AM Mike Christie <michael.christie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 4/12/23 2:56 AM, Jason Wang wrote: > >> I can spin another patchset with the single ioctl design so we can compare. > > So I'm fine with this approach. One last question, I see this: > > > > /* By default, a device gets one vhost_worker that its virtqueues share. This */ > > > > I'm wondering if it is better to have a vhost_get_worker() to return > > the worker_id of a specific queue. In the future, this might be useful > > for devices that have multiple workers by default? > > Yeah, it would be useful. Just 2 questions. You mean an ioctl command to get > this info right? I had added one in one version a while back, but dropped it > because for some reason I thought we were going to do a generic vhost sysfs > type of interface. We are not doing sysfs right? Probably, but we need to make sure the emulatorpin can work for libvirt at last. Thanks > _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization