On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 10:31:41AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 04:34:23PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote: > > Hi Peter, > > > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 09:50:09PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > 0-day robot reported graph-tracing made the cpuidle-vs-rcu rework go splat. > > > > Do you have a link toe the splat somewhere? > > > > I'm assuming that this is partially generic, and I'd like to make sure I test > > the right thing on arm64. I'll throw my usual lockdep options at the ftrace > > selftests... > > 0-day triggered this by running tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/ftracetest, > which is what I've been using to reproduce. > > If that don't work for you I can try and dig out the 0day email to see > if it has more details on. I had a go running those on arm64, but got different splats (as per my other replies), so I just wanted to see the backtraces and/or config to check I wasn't missing something due to CONFIG_* or arch differences. If you have the email to hand, that'd be great, but don't worry too much about it! Thanks, Mark. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
