Re: [PATCH 0/6] A few cpuidle vs rcu fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 04:34:23PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Hi Peter,
> 
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 09:50:09PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > 0-day robot reported graph-tracing made the cpuidle-vs-rcu rework go splat.
> 
> Do you have a link toe the splat somewhere?
> 
> I'm assuming that this is partially generic, and I'd like to make sure I test
> the right thing on arm64. I'll throw my usual lockdep options at the ftrace
> selftests...

0-day triggered this by running tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/ftracetest,
which is what I've been using to reproduce.

If that don't work for you I can try and dig out the 0day email to see
if it has more details on.
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization



[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux