> On Dec 1, 2022, at 1:30 AM, Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > !! External Email > > On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 05:08:06PM +0000, Arseniy Krasnov wrote: >> From: Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> This saves original behaviour from af_vsock.c - switch any error >> code returned from transport layer to ENOMEM. >> >> Signed-off-by: Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c | 9 ++++++++- >> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > @Bryan @Vishnu what do you think about this patch? > > A bit of context: > > Before this series, the af_vsock core always returned ENOMEM to the user > if the transport failed to queue the packet. > > Now we are changing it by returning the transport error. So I think here > we want to preserve the previous behavior for vmci, but I don't know if > that's the right thing. > Agree with Stefano. I don't think we need to preserve the previous behavior for vmci. > > @Arseniy please in the next versions describe better in the commit > messages the reasons for these changes, so it is easier review for > others and also in the future by reading the commit message we can > understand the reason for the change. > > Thanks, > Stefano > >> >> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c b/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c >> index 842c94286d31..289a36a203a2 100644 >> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c >> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c >> @@ -1838,7 +1838,14 @@ static ssize_t vmci_transport_stream_enqueue( >> struct msghdr *msg, >> size_t len) >> { >> - return vmci_qpair_enquev(vmci_trans(vsk)->qpair, msg, len, 0); >> + int err; >> + >> + err = vmci_qpair_enquev(vmci_trans(vsk)->qpair, msg, len, 0); >> + >> + if (err < 0) >> + err = -ENOMEM; >> + >> + return err; >> } >> >> static s64 vmci_transport_stream_has_data(struct vsock_sock *vsk) >> -- >> 2.25.1 > > > !! External Email: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization