On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 12:09:45AM +0200, Alvaro Karsz wrote:
> > I suggest defining a separate UAPI struct for this ioctl.
>
> Sounds fine to me.
> I could use the following struct
>
> struct virtio_blk_lifetime_ioctl {
> u16 pre_eol_info;
> u16 device_lifetime_est_typ_a;
> u16 device_lifetime_est_typ_b;
> u16 padding;
> };
OK. What makes it virtio specific though? Don't any other block
devices report lifetime? And shouldn't they share the same
ioctl then? Maybe this belongs to a generic lifetime.h ?
Comments documenting meaning of the fields would also be good.
--
MST
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
