Re: [PATCH] virtio_blk: add VIRTIO_BLK_F_LIFETIME feature support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> hmm what does this have to do with lifetime?

> Does this have something to do with lifetime?

At the moment, if a request operation is REQ_OP_DRV_IN, the function
virtblk_setup_cmd assigns the virtio type VIRTIO_BLK_T_GET_ID.
I changed it so a REQ_OP_DRV_IN operation could have different virtio types.

Instead of setting the type in virtblk_setup_cmd, the type for
REQ_OP_DRV_IN operations is set in the function that creates the
request (virtblk_get_id, virtblk_ioctl_lifetime)
I see now that I didn't add iopprio for legacy devices, I'll add it in
the next version.

> You don't need the cast to void *.

> Neither here.

> Nor here.

Ok.

> block comments have wrong format I think.

Are you talking about the empty top line?
/* empty
 * line 1
 * line 2
 */
 If so, I'll fix it.

> I think if you are going to pass struct virtio_blk_lifetime to
> userspace, better pass it as defined in the spec, in LE format.

Ok.
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization



[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux