On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 8:51 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Are you sure?
MichaelE is right.
This is just bogus historical garbage:
> arch/arm/include/asm/irq.h:#ifndef NO_IRQ
> arch/arm/include/asm/irq.h:#define NO_IRQ ((unsigned int)(-1))
that I've tried to get rid of for years, but for some reason it just won't die.
NO_IRQ should be zero. Or rather, it shouldn't exist at all. It's a bogus thing.
You can see just how bogus it is from grepping for it - the users are
all completely and utterly confused, and all are entirely historical
brokenness.
The correct way to check for "no irq" doesn't use NO_IRQ at all, it just does
if (dev->irq) ...
which is why you will only find a few instances of NO_IRQ in the tree
in the first place.
The NO_IRQ thing is mainly actually defined by a few drivers that just
never got converted to the proper world order, and even then you can
see the confusion (ie some drivers use "-1", others use "0", and yet
others use "((unsigned int)(-1)".
Linus
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
