Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> [ Cc += Bjorn & linux-pci ]
>
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 05:21:24PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>>> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> ...
>>> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > virtio: fixes, features
>>> >
>>> > 9k mtu perf improvements
>>> > vdpa feature provisioning
>>> > virtio blk SECURE ERASE support
>>> >
>>> > Fixes, cleanups all over the place.
>>> >
>>> > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> >
>>> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > Alvaro Karsz (1):
>>> > virtio_blk: add SECURE ERASE command support
>>> >
>>> > Angus Chen (1):
>>> > virtio_pci: don't try to use intxif pin is zero
>>>
>>> This commit breaks virtio_pci for me on powerpc, when running as a qemu
>>> guest.
>>>
>>> vp_find_vqs() bails out because pci_dev->pin == 0.
>>>
>>> But pci_dev->irq is populated correctly, so vp_find_vqs_intx() would
>>> succeed if we called it - which is what the code used to do.
>>>
>>> I think this happens because pci_dev->pin is not populated in
>>> pci_assign_irq().
>>>
>>> I would absolutely believe this is bug in our PCI code, but I think it
>>> may also affect other platforms that use of_irq_parse_and_map_pci().
>>
>> How about fixing this in of_irq_parse_and_map_pci then?
>> Something like the below maybe?
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/of.c b/drivers/pci/of.c
>> index 196834ed44fe..504c4d75c83f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/of.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/of.c
>> @@ -446,6 +446,8 @@ static int of_irq_parse_pci(const struct pci_dev *pdev, struct of_phandle_args *
>> if (pin == 0)
>> return -ENODEV;
>>
>> + pdev->pin = pin;
>> +
>> /* Local interrupt-map in the device node? Use it! */
>> if (of_get_property(dn, "interrupt-map", NULL)) {
>> pin = pci_swizzle_interrupt_pin(pdev, pin);
Backing up a bit. Should the virtio code be looking at pci_dev->pin in
the first place?
Shouldn't it be checking pci_dev->irq instead?
The original commit talks about irq being 0 and colliding with the timer
interrupt.
But all (most?) platforms have converged on 0 meaning NO_IRQ since quite
a fews ago AFAIK.
And the timer irq == 0 is a special case AIUI:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/CA+55aFwiLp1z+2mzkrFsid1WZQ0TQkcn8F2E6NL_AVR+m1fZ2w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
cheers
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
