On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 12:05 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, 14 Jul 2022 12:32:12 +0100 Martin Habets wrote: > > > Okay. Indeed, we could easily bolt something onto devlink, I'd think > > > but I don't know the space enough to push for one solution over > > > another. > > > > > > Please try to document the problem and the solution... somewhere, tho. > > > Otherwise the chances that the next vendor with this problem follows > > > the same approach fall from low to none. > > > > Yeah, good point. The obvious thing would be to create a > > Documentation/networking/device_drivers/ethernet/sfc/sfc/rst > > Is that generic enough for other vendors to find out, or there a better place? > > Documentation/vdpa.rst ? I don't see any kernel level notes on > implementing vDPA perhaps virt folks can suggest something. Not sure, since it's not a vDPA general thing but a vendor/parent specific thing. Or maybe Documentation/vdpa/sfc ? Thanks > I don't think people would be looking into driver-specific docs > when trying to implement an interface, so sfc is not a great option > IMHO. > > > I can do a follow-up patch for this. > > Let's make it part of the same series. > _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
