On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 05:38:03AM +0000, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
On 19.07.2022 15:48, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 08:17:31AM +0000, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
This callback controls setting of POLLIN,POLLRDNORM output bits
of poll() syscall,but in some cases,it is incorrectly to set it,
when socket has at least 1 bytes of available data. Use 'target'
which is already exists and equal to sk_rcvlowat in this case.
Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
index ec2c2afbf0d0..591908740992 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
@@ -634,7 +634,7 @@ virtio_transport_notify_poll_in(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
size_t target,
bool *data_ready_now)
{
- if (vsock_stream_has_data(vsk))
+ if (vsock_stream_has_data(vsk) >= target)
*data_ready_now = true;
else
*data_ready_now = false;
Perhaps we can take the opportunity to clean up the code in this way:
*data_ready_now = vsock_stream_has_data(vsk) >= target;
Ack
Anyway, I think we also need to fix the other transports (vmci and hyperv), what do you think?
For vmci it is look clear to fix it. For hyperv i need to check it more, because it already
uses some internal target value.
Yep, I see. Maybe you can pass `target` to hvs_channel_readable() and
use it as parameter of HVS_PKT_LEN().
@Dexuan what do you think?
Thanks,
Stefano
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
