Re: [RFC PATCH v1 3/3] vsock_test: POLLIN + SO_RCVLOWAT test.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 08:19:06AM +0000, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
This adds test to check, that when poll() returns POLLIN and
POLLRDNORM bits, next read call won't block.

Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 90 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
index dc577461afc2..8e394443eaf6 100644
--- a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
#include <sys/socket.h>
#include <time.h>
#include <sys/mman.h>
+#include <poll.h>

#include "timeout.h"
#include "control.h"
@@ -596,6 +597,90 @@ static void test_seqpacket_invalid_rec_buffer_server(const struct test_opts *opt
	close(fd);
}

+static void test_stream_poll_rcvlowat_server(const struct test_opts *opts)
+{
+#define RCVLOWAT_BUF_SIZE 128
+	int fd;
+	int i;
+
+	fd = vsock_stream_accept(VMADDR_CID_ANY, 1234, NULL);
+	if (fd < 0) {
+		perror("accept");
+		exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
+	}
+
+	/* Send 1 byte. */
+	send_byte(fd, 1, 0);
+
+	control_writeln("SRVSENT");
+
+	/* Just empirically delay value. */
+	sleep(4);

Why we need this sleep()?

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization



[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux