> From: Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2022 4:32 AM > > 在 2022/5/18 07:03, Parav Pandit 写道: > >>> And regarding vduse_dev_release() and existing empty release > >>> function, > >> they can be dynamically allocated. > >>> This is because they are really the struct device. > >> I do not understand this statement, sorry. > > It was bad sentence, my bad. > > > > What I wanted to say is, probably better explained with real patch below. > > In context of [1], struct vduse_mgmtdev empty release function can be > avoided by below inline patch [2]. > > > > [1]https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-virtualization/msg56371.html > > > > [2] patch: > > > Ok, if we go this way (looks more like mdev_parent). I think we need at least > rename the vdpa_mgmt_device, maybe vdpa_parent (like mdev_parent)? > It can be. Parent is also a device. So... Since there are no further comments on the inline patch, I will send it as separate patch this week. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
