On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 07:33:08PM +0800, Yongji Xie wrote:
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 11:04 PM Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 11:11:49AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > >On 2021/1/27 下午4:57, Stefano Garzarella wrote: >>On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 11:33:03AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >>> >>>On 2021/1/20 下午7:08, Stefano Garzarella wrote: >>>>On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 11:46:38AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >>>>> >>>>>On 2021/1/19 下午12:59, Xie Yongji wrote: >>>>>>With VDUSE, we should be able to support all kinds of virtio devices. >>>>>> >>>>>>Signed-off-by: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>--- >>>>>> drivers/vhost/vdpa.c | 29 +++-------------------------- >>>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) >>>>>> >>>>>>diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c >>>>>>index 29ed4173f04e..448be7875b6d 100644 >>>>>>--- a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c >>>>>>+++ b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c >>>>>>@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ >>>>>> #include <linux/nospec.h> >>>>>> #include <linux/vhost.h> >>>>>> #include <linux/virtio_net.h> >>>>>>+#include <linux/virtio_blk.h> >>>>>> #include "vhost.h" >>>>>>@@ -185,26 +186,6 @@ static long >>>>>>vhost_vdpa_set_status(struct vhost_vdpa *v, u8 __user >>>>>>*statusp) >>>>>> return 0; >>>>>> } >>>>>>-static int vhost_vdpa_config_validate(struct vhost_vdpa *v, >>>>>>- struct vhost_vdpa_config *c) >>>>>>-{ >>>>>>- long size = 0; >>>>>>- >>>>>>- switch (v->virtio_id) { >>>>>>- case VIRTIO_ID_NET: >>>>>>- size = sizeof(struct virtio_net_config); >>>>>>- break; >>>>>>- } >>>>>>- >>>>>>- if (c->len == 0) >>>>>>- return -EINVAL; >>>>>>- >>>>>>- if (c->len > size - c->off) >>>>>>- return -E2BIG; >>>>>>- >>>>>>- return 0; >>>>>>-} >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>I think we should use a separate patch for this. >>>> >>>>For the vdpa-blk simulator I had the same issues and I'm adding >>>>a .get_config_size() callback to vdpa devices. >>>> >>>>Do you think make sense or is better to remove this check in >>>>vhost/vdpa, delegating the boundaries checks to >>>>get_config/set_config callbacks. >>> >>> >>>A question here. How much value could we gain from >>>get_config_size() consider we can let vDPA parent to validate the >>>length in its get_config(). >>> >> >>I agree, most of the implementations already validate the length, >>the only gain is an error returned since get_config() is void, but >>eventually we can add a return value to it. > > >Right, one problem here is that. For the virito path, its get_config() >returns void. So we can not propagate error to virtio drivers. But it >might not be a big issue since we trust kernel virtio driver. > >So I think it makes sense to change the return value in the vdpa config ops. Thanks for your feedback! @Xie do you plan to do this? Otherwise I can do in my vdpa-blk-sim series, where for now I used this patch as is.Hi Stefano, please do in your vdpa-blk-sim series. I have no plan for it now.
Okay, I'll do it. Thanks, Stefano _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
