On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 11:46:38AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2021/1/19 下午12:59, Xie Yongji wrote:With VDUSE, we should be able to support all kinds of virtio devices. Signed-off-by: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/vhost/vdpa.c | 29 +++-------------------------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c index 29ed4173f04e..448be7875b6d 100644 --- a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c +++ b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ #include <linux/nospec.h> #include <linux/vhost.h> #include <linux/virtio_net.h> +#include <linux/virtio_blk.h> #include "vhost.h" @@ -185,26 +186,6 @@ static long vhost_vdpa_set_status(struct vhost_vdpa *v, u8 __user *statusp) return 0; } -static int vhost_vdpa_config_validate(struct vhost_vdpa *v, - struct vhost_vdpa_config *c) -{ - long size = 0; - - switch (v->virtio_id) { - case VIRTIO_ID_NET: - size = sizeof(struct virtio_net_config); - break; - } - - if (c->len == 0) - return -EINVAL; - - if (c->len > size - c->off) - return -E2BIG; - - return 0; -}I think we should use a separate patch for this.
For the vdpa-blk simulator I had the same issues and I'm adding a .get_config_size() callback to vdpa devices.
Do you think make sense or is better to remove this check in vhost/vdpa, delegating the boundaries checks to get_config/set_config callbacks.
Thanks, Stefano _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
