Re: [PATCH RFC 02/12] vdpa: split vdpasim to core and net modules

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Jason,
I just discovered that I missed the other questions in this email,
sorry for that!

On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 12:00:11PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:

On 2020/11/13 下午9:47, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
From: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@xxxxxxxxxx>

Introduce new vdpa_sim_net and vdpa_sim (core) drivers. This is a
preparation for adding a vdpa simulator module for block devices.

Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@xxxxxxxxxx>
[sgarzare: various cleanups/fixes]
Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
v1:
- Removed unused headers
- Removed empty module_init() module_exit()
- Moved vdpasim_is_little_endian() in vdpa_sim.h
- Moved vdpasim16_to_cpu/cpu_to_vdpasim16() in vdpa_sim.h
- Added vdpasim*_to_cpu/cpu_to_vdpasim*() also for 32 and 64
- Replaced 'select VDPA_SIM' with 'depends on VDPA_SIM' since selected
  option can not depend on other [Jason]


If possible, I would suggest to split this patch further:

1) convert to use void *config, and an attribute for setting config size during allocation
2) introduce supported_features
3) other attributes (#vqs)
4) rename config ops (more generic one)
5) introduce ops for set|get_config, set_get_features
6) real split



[...]

-static const struct vdpa_config_ops vdpasim_net_config_ops;
-static const struct vdpa_config_ops vdpasim_net_batch_config_ops;
+static const struct vdpa_config_ops vdpasim_config_ops;
+static const struct vdpa_config_ops vdpasim_batch_config_ops;
-static struct vdpasim *vdpasim_create(void)
+struct vdpasim *vdpasim_create(struct vdpasim_init_attr *attr)
 {
 	const struct vdpa_config_ops *ops;
 	struct vdpasim *vdpasim;
+	u32 device_id;
 	struct device *dev;
-	int ret = -ENOMEM;
+	int i, size, ret = -ENOMEM;
-	if (batch_mapping)
-		ops = &vdpasim_net_batch_config_ops;
+	device_id = attr->device_id;
+	/* Currently, we only accept the network and block devices. */
+	if (device_id != VIRTIO_ID_NET && device_id != VIRTIO_ID_BLOCK)
+		return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
+
+	if (attr->batch_mapping)
+		ops = &vdpasim_batch_config_ops;
 	else
-		ops = &vdpasim_net_config_ops;
+		ops = &vdpasim_config_ops;
 	vdpasim = vdpa_alloc_device(struct vdpasim, vdpa, NULL, ops, VDPASIM_VQ_NUM);
 	if (!vdpasim)
 		goto err_alloc;
-	INIT_WORK(&vdpasim->work, vdpasim_work);
+	if (device_id == VIRTIO_ID_NET)
+		size = sizeof(struct virtio_net_config);
+	else
+		size = sizeof(struct virtio_blk_config);


It's better to avoid such if/else consider we may introduce more type of devices.

Can we have an attribute of config size instead?

Yes, I'll move the patch 7 before this.

About config size and set/get_config ops, I'm not sure if it is better to hidden everything under the new set/get_config ops, allocating the config structure in each device, or leave the allocation in the core and update it like now.



+	vdpasim->config = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!vdpasim->config)
+		goto err_iommu;
+
+	vdpasim->device_id = device_id;
+	vdpasim->supported_features = attr->features;
+	INIT_WORK(&vdpasim->work, attr->work_fn);
 	spin_lock_init(&vdpasim->lock);
 	spin_lock_init(&vdpasim->iommu_lock);
@@ -379,23 +231,10 @@ static struct vdpasim *vdpasim_create(void)
 	if (!vdpasim->buffer)
 		goto err_iommu;
-	if (macaddr) {
-		mac_pton(macaddr, vdpasim->config.mac);
-		if (!is_valid_ether_addr(vdpasim->config.mac)) {
-			ret = -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
-			goto err_iommu;
-		}
-	} else {
-		eth_random_addr(vdpasim->config.mac);
-	}
-
-	vringh_set_iotlb(&vdpasim->vqs[0].vring, vdpasim->iommu);
-	vringh_set_iotlb(&vdpasim->vqs[1].vring, vdpasim->iommu);
+	for (i = 0; i < VDPASIM_VQ_NUM; i++)
+ vringh_set_iotlb(&vdpasim->vqs[i].vring, vdpasim->iommu);


And an attribute of #vqs here.

Yes.



 	vdpasim->vdpa.dma_dev = dev;
-	ret = vdpa_register_device(&vdpasim->vdpa);
-	if (ret)
-		goto err_iommu;
 	return vdpasim;
@@ -404,6 +243,7 @@ static struct vdpasim *vdpasim_create(void)
 err_alloc:
 	return ERR_PTR(ret);
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vdpasim_create);
 static int vdpasim_set_vq_address(struct vdpa_device *vdpa, u16 idx,
 				  u64 desc_area, u64 driver_area,
@@ -498,28 +338,34 @@ static u32 vdpasim_get_vq_align(struct vdpa_device *vdpa)
 static u64 vdpasim_get_features(struct vdpa_device *vdpa)
 {
-	return vdpasim_features;
+	struct vdpasim *vdpasim = vdpa_to_sim(vdpa);
+
+	return vdpasim->supported_features;
 }
static int vdpasim_set_features(struct vdpa_device *vdpa, u64 features)
 {
 	struct vdpasim *vdpasim = vdpa_to_sim(vdpa);
-	struct virtio_net_config *config = &vdpasim->config;
 	/* DMA mapping must be done by driver */
 	if (!(features & (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM)))
 		return -EINVAL;
-	vdpasim->features = features & vdpasim_features;
+	vdpasim->features = features & vdpasim->supported_features;
 	/* We generally only know whether guest is using the legacy interface
 	 * here, so generally that's the earliest we can set config fields.
 	 * Note: We actually require VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM above which
 	 * implies VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1, but let's not try to be clever here.
 	 */
+	if (vdpasim->device_id == VIRTIO_ID_NET) {
+		struct virtio_net_config *config =
+			(struct virtio_net_config *)vdpasim->config;
+
+		config->mtu = cpu_to_vdpasim16(vdpasim, 1500);
+		config->status = cpu_to_vdpasim16(vdpasim, VIRTIO_NET_S_LINK_UP);
+	}


Can we introduce callbacks of set_features/get_features here to avoid dealing of device type specific codes in generic simulator code?

Yes, I'll do.



-	config->mtu = cpu_to_vdpasim16(vdpasim, 1500);
- config->status = cpu_to_vdpasim16(vdpasim, VIRTIO_NET_S_LINK_UP);
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -536,7 +382,9 @@ static u16 vdpasim_get_vq_num_max(struct vdpa_device *vdpa)
 static u32 vdpasim_get_device_id(struct vdpa_device *vdpa)
 {
-	return VDPASIM_DEVICE_ID;
+	struct vdpasim *vdpasim = vdpa_to_sim(vdpa);
+
+	return vdpasim->device_id;
 }
 static u32 vdpasim_get_vendor_id(struct vdpa_device *vdpa)
@@ -572,8 +420,12 @@ static void vdpasim_get_config(struct vdpa_device *vdpa, unsigned int offset,
 {
 	struct vdpasim *vdpasim = vdpa_to_sim(vdpa);
-	if (offset + len < sizeof(struct virtio_net_config))
-		memcpy(buf, (u8 *)&vdpasim->config + offset, len);
+	if (vdpasim->device_id == VIRTIO_ID_BLOCK &&
+	    (offset + len < sizeof(struct virtio_blk_config)))
+		memcpy(buf, vdpasim->config + offset, len);
+	else if (vdpasim->device_id == VIRTIO_ID_NET &&
+		 (offset + len < sizeof(struct virtio_net_config)))
+		memcpy(buf, vdpasim->config + offset, len);


Similarly, can we introduce set/get_config ops?

Ditto.




[...]

diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim_net.c b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim_net.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..c68d5488ab54
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim_net.c
@@ -0,0 +1,153 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/*
+ * VDPA simulator for networking device.
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2020, Red Hat Inc. All rights reserved.
+ *     Author: Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx>
+ *
+ */
+
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/etherdevice.h>
+
+#include "vdpa_sim.h"
+
+#define VDPASIM_NET_FEATURES	(1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_MAC)
+
+static int batch_mapping = 1;
+module_param(batch_mapping, int, 0444);
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(batch_mapping, "Batched mapping 1 - Enable; 0 - Disable");

I think batch_mapping should belong to vpda_sim core module.

Yes, I agree, I'll leave it in the core.




[...]

diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/Kconfig b/drivers/vdpa/Kconfig
index d7d32b656102..fdb1a9267347 100644
--- a/drivers/vdpa/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/vdpa/Kconfig
@@ -9,11 +9,16 @@ menuconfig VDPA
 if VDPA
 config VDPA_SIM
-	tristate "vDPA device simulator"
+	tristate "vDPA simulator core"
 	depends on RUNTIME_TESTING_MENU && HAS_DMA
 	select DMA_OPS
 	select VHOST_RING
 	default n
+
+config VDPA_SIM_NET
+	tristate "vDPA simulator for networking device"
+	depends on VDPA_SIM
+	default n


I remember somebody told me that if we don't enable a module it was disabled by default.

So, should I remove "default n" from vdpa_sim* entries?

Thanks,
Stefano

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux