On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 12:42:15PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 10:43 PM Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 09:09:28AM -0700, trix@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > From: Tom Rix <trix@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > This is a upcoming change to clean up a new warning treewide. > > > I am wondering if the change could be one mega patch (see below) or > > > normal patch per file about 100 patches or somewhere half way by collecting > > > early acks. > > > > Please break it up into one-patch-per-subsystem, like normal, and get it > > merged that way. > > > > Sending us a patch, without even a diffstat to review, isn't going to > > get you very far... > > Tom, > If you're able to automate this cleanup, I suggest checking in a > script that can be run on a directory. Then for each subsystem you > can say in your commit "I ran scripts/fix_whatever.py on this subdir." > Then others can help you drive the tree wide cleanup. Then we can > enable -Wunreachable-code-break either by default, or W=2 right now > might be a good idea. I remember using clang-modernize in the past to fix issues very similar to this, if clang machinery can generate the warning, can't something like clang-tidy directly generate the patch? You can send me a patch for drivers/infiniband/* as well Thanks, Jason _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
