On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 09:49:03AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 17.04.20 08:28, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 04:52:42PM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote: > >> On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 3:13 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> > >>> On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 12:30:38PM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote: > >>>> From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>>> > >>>> If we have free page hinting or page reporting enabled we should disable it > >>>> if the pages are poisoned or initialized on free and we cannot notify the > >>>> hypervisor. > >>>> > >>>> Fixes: 5d757c8d518d ("virtio-balloon: add support for providing free page reports to host") > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>> > >>> > >>> Why not put this logic in the hypervisor? > >> > >> I did that too. This is to cover the case where somebody is running > >> the code prior to my QEMU changes where the page poison feature wasn't > >> being enabled. > > > > > > Hmm so that one looks like a QEMU bug (does not expose poison flag). In > > the past we just said need to fix the bug where it's found unless the > > issue is very widespread and major. Let's assume QEMU learns to always > > expose POISON with HINT. Then this configuration (HINT && !POISON) > > allows us to detect old QEMU (pre your changes). > > Don't see why this is a QEMU bug. It's just a feature it does not > implement. Perfectly valid. I'll need to think about this. We need to remember that the whole HINT thing is not a mandate for host to corrupt memory. It's just some info about page use guest gives host. If host corrupts memory it's broken ... > [...] > >> > >> The problem is we cannot communicate the full situation to the > >> hypervisor without the page poison feature being present. As such I > >> would worry about that backfiring on us due to the hypervisor acting > >> on incomplete data. > > > > > > I'll try to think about VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_FREE_PAGE_HINT situation > > over the weekend. But for the new page reporting, why not > > I shared my thoughts about VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_FREE_PAGE_HINT in the other > thread and think we should simply not care at all for now. > > > assume host implementation will be sane? > > I don't think we should enforce having poison support around. See my > reply to this mail for an alternative. OK so you basically say leave this to host to handle? That's more or less what I'm saying too. > -- > Thanks, > > David / dhildenb _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization