Re: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH] virtio-balloon: Disable free page hinting/reporting if page poison is disabled

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 17.04.20 08:28, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 04:52:42PM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 3:13 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 12:30:38PM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>>>> From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>
>>>> If we have free page hinting or page reporting enabled we should disable it
>>>> if the pages are poisoned or initialized on free and we cannot notify the
>>>> hypervisor.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 5d757c8d518d ("virtio-balloon: add support for providing free page reports to host")
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>>
>>> Why not put this logic in the hypervisor?
>>
>> I did that too. This is to cover the case where somebody is running
>> the code prior to my QEMU changes where the page poison feature wasn't
>> being enabled.
> 
> 
> Hmm so that one looks like a QEMU bug (does not expose poison flag).  In
> the past we just said need to fix the bug where it's found unless the
> issue is very widespread and major.  Let's assume QEMU learns to always
> expose POISON with HINT.  Then this configuration (HINT && !POISON)
> allows us to detect old QEMU (pre your changes).

Don't see why this is a QEMU bug. It's just a feature it does not
implement. Perfectly valid.

[...]
>>
>> The problem is we cannot communicate the full situation to the
>> hypervisor without the page poison feature being present. As such I
>> would worry about that backfiring on us due to the hypervisor acting
>> on incomplete data.
> 
> 
> I'll try to think about VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_FREE_PAGE_HINT situation
> over the weekend. But for the new page reporting, why not

I shared my thoughts about VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_FREE_PAGE_HINT in the other
thread and think we should simply not care at all for now.

> assume host implementation will be sane?

I don't think we should enforce having poison support around. See my
reply to this mail for an alternative.

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization



[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux