On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 08:13:19PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote: > > Should this have: > > > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 4.19+ > > I guess as nothing will actually "crash" it's not worth stable. No - it's a regression, it would be a stable candidate from that POV. The issue is the patch size - stable rules say: - It cannot be bigger than 100 lines, with context. This is about 200 lines with context. In practice Fixes: is enough to make a bunch of downstreams pick it up. -- MST _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
