On Tue, 10 Mar 2020, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Commit 71994620bb25 ("virtio_balloon: replace oom notifier with shrinker")
> changed the behavior when deflation happens automatically. Instead of
> deflating when called by the OOM handler, the shrinker is used.
>
> However, the balloon is not simply some other slab cache that should be
> shrunk when under memory pressure. The shrinker does not have a concept of
> priorities yet, so this behavior cannot be configured. Eventually once
> that is in place, we might want to switch back after doing proper
> testing.
>
> There was a report that this results in undesired side effects when
> inflating the balloon to shrink the page cache. [1]
> "When inflating the balloon against page cache (i.e. no free memory
> remains) vmscan.c will both shrink page cache, but also invoke the
> shrinkers -- including the balloon's shrinker. So the balloon
> driver allocates memory which requires reclaim, vmscan gets this
> memory by shrinking the balloon, and then the driver adds the
> memory back to the balloon. Basically a busy no-op."
>
> The name "deflate on OOM" makes it pretty clear when deflation should
> happen - after other approaches to reclaim memory failed, not while
> reclaiming. This allows to minimize the footprint of a guest - memory
> will only be taken out of the balloon when really needed.
>
> Keep using the shrinker for VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_FREE_PAGE_HINT, because
> this has no such side effects. Always register the shrinker with
> VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_FREE_PAGE_HINT now. We are always allowed to reuse free
> pages that are still to be processed by the guest. The hypervisor takes
> care of identifying and resolving possible races between processing a
> hinting request and the guest reusing a page.
>
> In contrast to pre commit 71994620bb25 ("virtio_balloon: replace oom
> notifier with shrinker"), don't add a moodule parameter to configure the
> number of pages to deflate on OOM. Can be re-added if really needed.
> Also, pay attention that leak_balloon() returns the number of 4k pages -
> convert it properly in virtio_balloon_oom_notify().
>
> Testing done by Tyler for future reference:
> Test setup: VM with 16 CPU, 64GB RAM. Running Debian 10. We have a 42
> GB file full of random bytes that we continually cat to /dev/null.
> This fills the page cache as the file is read. Meanwhile we trigger
> the balloon to inflate, with a target size of 53 GB. This setup causes
> the balloon inflation to pressure the page cache as the page cache is
> also trying to grow. Afterwards we shrink the balloon back to zero (so
> total deflate = total inflate).
>
> Without patch (kernel 4.19.0-5):
> Inflation never reaches the target until we stop the "cat file >
> /dev/null" process. Total inflation time was 542 seconds. The longest
> period that made no net forward progress was 315 seconds (see attached
> graph).
> Result of "grep balloon /proc/vmstat" after the test:
> balloon_inflate 154828377
> balloon_deflate 154828377
>
> With patch (kernel 5.6.0-rc4+):
> Total inflation duration was 63 seconds. No deflate-queue activity
> occurs when pressuring the page-cache.
> Result of "grep balloon /proc/vmstat" after the test:
> balloon_inflate 12968539
> balloon_deflate 12968539
>
> Conclusion: This patch fixes the issue. In the test it reduced
> inflate/deflate activity by 12x, and reduced inflation time by 8.6x.
> But more importantly, if we hadn't killed the "grep balloon
> /proc/vmstat" process then, without the patch, the inflation process
> would never reach the target.
>
> [1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-virtualization/msg40863.html
>
> Reported-by: Tyler Sanderson <tysand@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Tyler Sanderson <tysand@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Fixes: 71994620bb25 ("virtio_balloon: replace oom notifier with shrinker")
> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Nadav Amit <namit@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
Should this have:
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 4.19+
?
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
