On 2019/9/26 下午9:14, Tiwei Bie wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 04:35:18AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 12:54:27PM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote:
[...]
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h b/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h
index 40d028eed645..5afbc2f08fa3 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h
@@ -116,4 +116,12 @@
#define VHOST_VSOCK_SET_GUEST_CID _IOW(VHOST_VIRTIO, 0x60, __u64)
#define VHOST_VSOCK_SET_RUNNING _IOW(VHOST_VIRTIO, 0x61, int)
+/* VHOST_MDEV specific defines */
+
+#define VHOST_MDEV_SET_STATE _IOW(VHOST_VIRTIO, 0x70, __u64)
+
+#define VHOST_MDEV_S_STOPPED 0
+#define VHOST_MDEV_S_RUNNING 1
+#define VHOST_MDEV_S_MAX 2
+
#endif
So assuming we have an underlying device that behaves like virtio:
I think they are really good questions/suggestions. Thanks!
1. Should we use SET_STATUS maybe?
I like this idea. I will give it a try.
2. Do we want a reset ioctl?
I think it is helpful. If we use SET_STATUS, maybe we
can use it to support the reset.
3. Do we want ability to enable rings individually?
I will make it possible at least in the vhost layer.
Note the API support e.g set_vq_ready().
4. Does device need to limit max ring size?
5. Does device need to limit max number of queues?
I think so. It's helpful to have ioctls to report the max
ring size and max number of queues.
An issue is the max number of queues is done through a device specific
way, usually device configuration space. This is supported by the
transport API, but how to expose it to userspace may need more thought.
Thanks
Thanks!
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
