On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 04:35:18AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 12:54:27PM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote: [...] > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h b/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h > > index 40d028eed645..5afbc2f08fa3 100644 > > --- a/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h > > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h > > @@ -116,4 +116,12 @@ > > #define VHOST_VSOCK_SET_GUEST_CID _IOW(VHOST_VIRTIO, 0x60, __u64) > > #define VHOST_VSOCK_SET_RUNNING _IOW(VHOST_VIRTIO, 0x61, int) > > > > +/* VHOST_MDEV specific defines */ > > + > > +#define VHOST_MDEV_SET_STATE _IOW(VHOST_VIRTIO, 0x70, __u64) > > + > > +#define VHOST_MDEV_S_STOPPED 0 > > +#define VHOST_MDEV_S_RUNNING 1 > > +#define VHOST_MDEV_S_MAX 2 > > + > > #endif > > So assuming we have an underlying device that behaves like virtio: I think they are really good questions/suggestions. Thanks! > > 1. Should we use SET_STATUS maybe? I like this idea. I will give it a try. > 2. Do we want a reset ioctl? I think it is helpful. If we use SET_STATUS, maybe we can use it to support the reset. > 3. Do we want ability to enable rings individually? I will make it possible at least in the vhost layer. > 4. Does device need to limit max ring size? > 5. Does device need to limit max number of queues? I think so. It's helpful to have ioctls to report the max ring size and max number of queues. Thanks! Tiwei > > -- > MST _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
