On Mon, 27 May 2019 13:00:28 +0200
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 23 May 2019 18:22:07 +0200
> Michael Mueller <mimu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > From: Halil Pasic <pasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > This will come in handy soon when we pull out the indicators from
> > virtio_ccw_device to a memory area that is shared with the hypervisor
> > (in particular for protected virtualization guests).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> >
>
> > @@ -338,17 +348,17 @@ static void virtio_ccw_drop_indicator(struct virtio_ccw_device *vcdev,
> > ccw->cda = (__u32)(unsigned long) thinint_area;
> > } else {
> > /* payload is the address of the indicators */
> > - indicatorp = kmalloc(sizeof(&vcdev->indicators),
> > + indicatorp = kmalloc(sizeof(indicators(vcdev)),
> > GFP_DMA | GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (!indicatorp)
> > return;
> > *indicatorp = 0;
> > ccw->cmd_code = CCW_CMD_SET_IND;
> > - ccw->count = sizeof(&vcdev->indicators);
> > + ccw->count = sizeof(indicators(vcdev));
> > ccw->cda = (__u32)(unsigned long) indicatorp;
> > }
> > /* Deregister indicators from host. */
> > - vcdev->indicators = 0;
> > + *indicators(vcdev) = 0;
>
> I'm not too hot about this notation, but it's not wrong and a minor
> thing :)
I don't have any better ideas :/
>
> > ccw->flags = 0;
> > ret = ccw_io_helper(vcdev, ccw,
> > vcdev->is_thinint ?
>
> Patch looks reasonable and not dependent on the other patches here.
>
looks reasonable == r-b?
Not dependent in a sense that this patch could be made a first patch in
the series. A subsequent patch depends on it.
Regards,
Halil
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
