On Thu, 23 May 2019 18:22:07 +0200
Michael Mueller <mimu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Halil Pasic <pasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This will come in handy soon when we pull out the indicators from
> virtio_ccw_device to a memory area that is shared with the hypervisor
> (in particular for protected virtualization guests).
>
> Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> @@ -338,17 +348,17 @@ static void virtio_ccw_drop_indicator(struct virtio_ccw_device *vcdev,
> ccw->cda = (__u32)(unsigned long) thinint_area;
> } else {
> /* payload is the address of the indicators */
> - indicatorp = kmalloc(sizeof(&vcdev->indicators),
> + indicatorp = kmalloc(sizeof(indicators(vcdev)),
> GFP_DMA | GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!indicatorp)
> return;
> *indicatorp = 0;
> ccw->cmd_code = CCW_CMD_SET_IND;
> - ccw->count = sizeof(&vcdev->indicators);
> + ccw->count = sizeof(indicators(vcdev));
> ccw->cda = (__u32)(unsigned long) indicatorp;
> }
> /* Deregister indicators from host. */
> - vcdev->indicators = 0;
> + *indicators(vcdev) = 0;
I'm not too hot about this notation, but it's not wrong and a minor
thing :)
> ccw->flags = 0;
> ret = ccw_io_helper(vcdev, ccw,
> vcdev->is_thinint ?
Patch looks reasonable and not dependent on the other patches here.
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
