On 2018/11/8 上午9:56, jiangyiwen wrote:
On 2018/11/7 21:32, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2018/11/7 下午3:11, jiangyiwen wrote:
On 2018/11/7 14:18, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2018/11/6 下午2:30, jiangyiwen wrote:
Seems duplicated with the one used by vhost-net.
In packed virtqueue implementation, I plan to move this to vhost.c.
Yes, this code is full copied from vhost-net, if it can be packed into
vhost.c, it would be great.
If you try to reuse vhost-net, you don't even need to care about this:)
Thanks
.
Hi Jason,
Thank your advice, I will consider your idea. But I don't know
what's stefan's suggestion? It seems that he doesn't care much
about this community.:(
I think not. He is probably busy these days.
I still hope this community can have some vitality.
Let's wait for few more days for the possible comments from Stefan or Michael. But I do prefer to unify the virtio networking datapath which will be easier to be extended and maintained.
Thanks
.
Hi Jason,
Actually vsock use virtio-net as transport path should be a better idea,
I will try to consider the new idea.
Thanks,
Yiwen.
Good to know this and thanks!
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
