On 2018/11/7 21:32, Jason Wang wrote: > > On 2018/11/7 下午3:11, jiangyiwen wrote: >> On 2018/11/7 14:18, Jason Wang wrote: >>> On 2018/11/6 下午2:30, jiangyiwen wrote: >>>>> Seems duplicated with the one used by vhost-net. >>>>> >>>>> In packed virtqueue implementation, I plan to move this to vhost.c. >>>>> >>>> Yes, this code is full copied from vhost-net, if it can be packed into >>>> vhost.c, it would be great. >>>> >>> If you try to reuse vhost-net, you don't even need to care about this:) >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> >>> . >>> >> Hi Jason, >> >> Thank your advice, I will consider your idea. But I don't know >> what's stefan's suggestion? It seems that he doesn't care much >> about this community.:( > > > I think not. He is probably busy these days. > > >> >> I still hope this community can have some vitality. >> > > Let's wait for few more days for the possible comments from Stefan or Michael. But I do prefer to unify the virtio networking datapath which will be easier to be extended and maintained. > > Thanks > > > . > Hi Jason, Actually vsock use virtio-net as transport path should be a better idea, I will try to consider the new idea. Thanks, Yiwen. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
