* Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 5:17 PM H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On 06/14/18 13:59, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 1:48 PM H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> > > >> On 06/13/18 14:05, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > > >>> From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > >>> > > >>> i386 and x86-64 uses different registers for arguments; make them > > >>> available so we don't have to #ifdef in the actual code. > > >>> > > >>> Native size and specified size (q, l, w, b) versions are provided. > > >>> > > >>> Suggested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx> > > >>> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > >>> Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx> > > >> > > >> I still object to Suggested-by: here. Sedat did a correction, which is > > >> a Reviewed-by:, but unless I'm completely out to sea, there was no > > >> suggestion on Sedat's part of this; and I had certainly not seen it when > > >> I wrote the code. > > > > > > I'm fine with changing it from a Suggested-by to a Reviewed-by. Can > > > you do that when you apply the set, or should I send a v6? > > > > > > > I'm not handling patch mechanics for x86 at the moment. > > Hi Ingo and Thomas, > Have you had a chance to review this patch series for application? > > Note that Juergen (the paravirt maintainer) acked the series: > https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37880 > The only issue being swapping a Suggested-by for a Reviewed-by tag for > one commit, as above. Could you please update the series with all suggestions and tags and send a new series? Thanks, Ingo _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
