On 06/14/18 13:59, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 1:48 PM H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On 06/13/18 14:05, Nick Desaulniers wrote: >>> From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> i386 and x86-64 uses different registers for arguments; make them >>> available so we don't have to #ifdef in the actual code. >>> >>> Native size and specified size (q, l, w, b) versions are provided. >>> >>> Suggested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx> >>> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> I still object to Suggested-by: here. Sedat did a correction, which is >> a Reviewed-by:, but unless I'm completely out to sea, there was no >> suggestion on Sedat's part of this; and I had certainly not seen it when >> I wrote the code. > > I'm fine with changing it from a Suggested-by to a Reviewed-by. Can > you do that when you apply the set, or should I send a v6? > I'm not handling patch mechanics for x86 at the moment. -hpa _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
