On 5 December 2017 at 21:20, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 11:59:17AM +0200, achiad shochat wrote: >> Then we'll have a single solution for both netvsc and virtio (and any >> other PV device). >> And we could handle the VF DMA dirt issue agnostically. > > For the record, I won't block patches adding this kist to virtio > on the basis that they must be generic. It's not a lot > of code, implementation can come first, prettify later. It's not a lot of code either way. So I fail to understand why not to do it right from the beginning. For the record... > > But we do need to have a discussion about how devices are paired. > I am not sure using just MAC works. E.g. some passthrough > devices don't give host ability to set the MAC. > Are these worth worrying about? > > -- > MST _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
