On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 08:47:08PM +0800, Wei Wang wrote: > On 07/29/2017 07:08 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 10:50:11AM +0800, Wei Wang wrote: > > > > > > OK I thought this over. While we might need these new APIs in > > > > > > the future, I think that at the moment, there's a way to implement > > > > > > this feature that is significantly simpler. Just add each s/g > > > > > > as a separate input buffer. > > > > > Should it be an output buffer? > > > > Hypervisor overwrites these pages with zeroes. Therefore it is > > > > writeable by device: DMA_FROM_DEVICE. > > > Why would the hypervisor need to zero the buffer? > > The page is supplied to hypervisor and can lose the value that > > is there. That is the definition of writeable by device. > > I think for the free pages, it should be clear that they will be added as > output buffer to the device, because (as we discussed) they are just hints, > and some of them may be used by the guest after the report_ API is invoked. > The device/hypervisor should not use or discard them. Discarding contents is exactly what you propose doing if migration is going on, isn't it? > For the balloon pages, I kind of agree with the existing implementation > (e.g. inside tell_host()), which uses virtqueue_add_outbuf (instead of > _add_inbuf()). This is because it does not pass SGs, it passes weirdly formatted PA within the buffer. > I think inbuf should be a buffer which will be written by the device and > read by the > driver. If hypervisor can change it, it's an inbuf. Should not matter whether driver reads it. > The cmd buffer put on the vq for the device to send commands can be > an > inbuf, I think. > > > > > > > I think it may only > > > need to read out the info(base,size). > > And then do what? > > > For the free pages, the info will be used to clear the corresponding "1" in > the dirty bitmap. > For balloon pages, they will be made DONTNEED and given to other host > processes to > use (the device won't write them, so no need to set "write" when > virtqueue_map_desc() in > the device). > > > > > > > I think it should be like this: > > > the cmd hdr buffer: input, because the hypervisor would write it to > > > send a cmd to the guest > > > the payload buffer: output, for the hypervisor to read the info > > These should be split. > > > > We have: > > > > 1. request that hypervisor sends to guest, includes ID: input > > 2. synchronisation header with ID sent by guest: output > > 3. list of pages: input > > > > 2 and 3 must be on the same VQ. 1 can come on any VQ - reusing stats VQ > > might make sense. > > I would prefer to make the above item 1 come on the the free page vq, > because the existing stat_vq doesn't support the cmd hdr. > Now, I think it is also not necessary to move the existing stat_vq > implementation to > a new implementation under the cmd hdr, because > that new support doesn't make a difference for stats, it will still use its > stat_vq (the free > page vq will be used for reporting free pages only) > > What do you think? > > > Best, > Wei _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
