Re: [PATCH v12 5/8] virtio-balloon: VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_SG

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/29/2017 07:08 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 10:50:11AM +0800, Wei Wang wrote:
OK I thought this over. While we might need these new APIs in
the future, I think that at the moment, there's a way to implement
this feature that is significantly simpler. Just add each s/g
as a separate input buffer.
Should it be an output buffer?
Hypervisor overwrites these pages with zeroes. Therefore it is
writeable by device: DMA_FROM_DEVICE.
Why would the hypervisor need to zero the buffer?
The page is supplied to hypervisor and can lose the value that
is there.  That is the definition of writeable by device.

I think for the free pages, it should be clear that they will be added as
output buffer to the device, because (as we discussed) they are just hints,
and some of them may be used by the guest after the report_ API is invoked.
The device/hypervisor should not use or discard them.

For the balloon pages, I kind of agree with the existing implementation
(e.g. inside tell_host()), which uses virtqueue_add_outbuf (instead of _add_inbuf()). I think inbuf should be a buffer which will be written by the device and read by the driver. The cmd buffer put on the vq for the device to send commands can be an
inbuf, I think.



I think it may only
need to read out the info(base,size).
And then do what?


For the free pages, the info will be used to clear the corresponding "1" in the dirty bitmap. For balloon pages, they will be made DONTNEED and given to other host processes to use (the device won't write them, so no need to set "write" when virtqueue_map_desc() in
the device).



I think it should be like this:
the cmd hdr buffer: input, because the hypervisor would write it to
send a cmd to the guest
the payload buffer: output, for the hypervisor to read the info
These should be split.

We have:

1. request that hypervisor sends to guest, includes ID: input
2. synchronisation header with ID sent by guest: output
3. list of pages: input

2 and 3 must be on the same VQ. 1 can come on any VQ - reusing stats VQ
might make sense.

I would prefer to make the above item 1 come on the the free page vq,
because the existing stat_vq doesn't support the cmd hdr.
Now, I think it is also not necessary to move the existing stat_vq implementation to
a new implementation under the cmd hdr, because
that new support doesn't make a difference for stats, it will still use its stat_vq (the free
page vq will be used for reporting free pages only)

What do you think?


Best,
Wei
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization



[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux