On 2017年02月03日 17:52, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 05:47:41PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
No, we need to allocate the array larger in that case as want proper
names for the interrupts.
Consider the case of !per_vq_vectors, the size of msix_names is 2, but
snprintf can do out of bound accessing here. (We name the msix shared by
virtqueues with something like "%s-virtqueues" before the patch).
Yes, that's what I meant above - we need to allocate a large array
starting with this patch. I'll fix it up for the next version.
I see.
Thanks
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
