On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 05:47:41PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> No, we need to allocate the array larger in that case as want proper >> names for the interrupts. > > Consider the case of !per_vq_vectors, the size of msix_names is 2, but > snprintf can do out of bound accessing here. (We name the msix shared by > virtqueues with something like "%s-virtqueues" before the patch). Yes, that's what I meant above - we need to allocate a large array starting with this patch. I'll fix it up for the next version. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
