On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 07:15:44AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-09-17 at 08:33 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 07:29:17PM -0500, Suman Anna wrote:
> > > The virtio core uses a static ida named virtio_index_ida for
> > > assigning index numbers to virtio devices during registration.
> > > The ida core may allocate some internal idr cache layers and
> > > an ida bitmap upon any ida allocation, and all these layers are
> > > truely freed only upon the ida destruction. The virtio_index_ida
> > > is not destroyed at present, leading to a memory leak when using
> > > the virtio core as a module and atleast one virtio device is
> > > registered and unregistered.
> > >
> > > Fix this by invoking ida_destroy() in the virtio core module
> > > exit.
> > >
> > > Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@xxxxxx>
> >
> > Interesting.
> > Will the same apply to e.g. sd_index_ida in drivers/scsi/sd.c
> > or iscsi_sess_ida in drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_iscsi.c?
> >
> > If no, why not?
> >
> > One doesn't generally expect to have to free global variables.
> > Maybe we should forbid DEFINE_IDA in modules?
> >
> > James, could you comment on this please?
>
> ida is Tejun's baby (cc'd). However, it does look like without
> ida_destroy() you will leave a cached ida->bitmap dangling because we're
> trying to be a bit clever in ida_remove() so we cache the bitmap to
> relieve ida_pre_get() of the burden if we would otherwise free it.
>
> I don't understand why you'd want to forbid DEFINE_IDA ... all it does
> is pre-initialise a usually static ida structure. The initialised
> structure will have a NULL bitmap cache that's allocated in the first
> ida_pre_get() ... that all seems to work as expected and no different
> from a dynamically allocated struct ida. Or are you thinking because
> ida_destory() doesn't set bitmap to NULL, it damages the reuse? In
> which case I'm not sure there's much benefit to making it reusable, but
> I suppose we could by adding a memset into ida_destroy().
>
> James
It's just unusual to have a descructor without a constructor.
I bet more drivers misuse this AI because of this.
> > > ---
> > > drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 1 +
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c
> > > index b1877d73fa56..7062bb0975a5 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c
> > > @@ -412,6 +412,7 @@ static int virtio_init(void)
> > > static void __exit virtio_exit(void)
> > > {
> > > bus_unregister(&virtio_bus);
> > > + ida_destroy(&virtio_index_ida);
> > > }
> > > core_initcall(virtio_init);
> > > module_exit(virtio_exit);
> > > --
> > > 2.5.0
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
