From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 22:17:17 +1030 > This paraphrases DaveM (and steals some of his words) explaining why > a device shouldn't return NETDEV_TX_BUSY, even though it looks so inviting > to driver authors. > > See http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg322350.html > > Inspired-by: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Applied. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
