[PATCH net-next] netdevice: document NETDEV_TX_BUSY deprecation.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This paraphrases DaveM (and steals some of his words) explaining why
a device shouldn't return NETDEV_TX_BUSY, even though it looks so inviting
to driver authors.

See http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg322350.html

Inspired-by: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
index dcf6ec27739b..a2cad44b8630 100644
--- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
+++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
@@ -795,7 +795,10 @@ typedef u16 (*select_queue_fallback_t)(struct net_device *dev,
  * netdev_tx_t (*ndo_start_xmit)(struct sk_buff *skb,
  *                               struct net_device *dev);
  *	Called when a packet needs to be transmitted.
- *	Must return NETDEV_TX_OK , NETDEV_TX_BUSY.
+ *	Returns NETDEV_TX_OK.  Can return NETDEV_TX_BUSY, but you should stop
+ *	the queue before that can happen; it's for obsolete devices and weird
+ *	corner cases, but the stack really does a non-trivial amount
+ *	of useless work if you return NETDEV_TX_BUSY.
  *        (can also return NETDEV_TX_LOCKED iff NETIF_F_LLTX)
  *	Required can not be NULL.
  *
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux