On Thu, 11 Dec 2014 19:05:26 +0200
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 03:46:23PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 Dec 2014 14:25:06 +0100
> > Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > Add a helper function for checking whether a bit is set in the guest
> > > features for a vdev as well as one that works on a feature bit set.
> > >
> > > Convert code that open-coded this: It cleans up the code and makes it
> > > easier to extend the guest feature bits.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ...
> > > diff --git a/hw/scsi/virtio-scsi.c b/hw/scsi/virtio-scsi.c
> > > index ef48550..56c92fb 100644
> > > --- a/hw/scsi/virtio-scsi.c
> > > +++ b/hw/scsi/virtio-scsi.c
> > > @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ static int virtio_scsi_parse_req(VirtIOSCSIReq *req,
> > > *
> > > * TODO: always disable this workaround for virtio 1.0 devices.
> > > */
> > > - if ((vdev->guest_features & VIRTIO_F_ANY_LAYOUT) == 0) {
> > > + if (!virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_F_ANY_LAYOUT)) {
> >
> > Wait ... this does not only look like a clean-up, but also like a
> > bug-fix to me, since it should have been "(1 << VIRTIO_F_ANY_LAYOUT)"
> > instead of "VIRTIO_F_ANY_LAYOUT" in the original code instead?
I've clearly been looking at this stuff for too long, as I didn't even
notice this bug :)
> >
> > So in case this patch queue takes a little bit longer 'til it gets
> > upstream, do we might want to submit a separate patch for fixing this
> > issue first?
>
> Yes, please do.
OK, will send.
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
