On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 10:24:26AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Michael, > > On Fri, 12 Dec 2014 00:01:57 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > It was on linux next for a while, then I wanted to tweak the commit log > > for some messages a bit. > > So since I rewrote the history anyway, I went ahead and rebased it > > on v3.18, after this rebase it's been in linux-next for several days. > > Maybe you think you pushed it into a linux-next included branch (or > maybe you think I am fetching a branch that I am not), Oh. I thought linux-next is pulling vhost-next, when in fact it turns out it's pulling it's own linux-next branch. So it looks like I didn't update that branch in a while - now I see why it's a bit so quiet. It's probably best to keep it at linux-next branch, as it is: I've tweaked my push rules to update that branch now, and pushed again. Thanks a lot for letting me know! > but when I look > at those commits in my tree (as I fetch Linus' tree into mine) none of > them precede any of the next-* tags ... > > I am not doubting that these patches have been published and reviewed > and tested, all I am saying is that they have not been in linux-next > as those commits. You are right of course. > -- > Cheers, > Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
