On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 03:17:50PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Nov 2014 16:05:39 +0200
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 02:54:38PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > > On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 18:43:10 +0200
> > > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > > @@ -174,6 +174,37 @@ enum {
> > > >
> > > > static inline int vhost_has_feature(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, int bit)
> > > > {
> > > > - return vq->acked_features & (1 << bit);
> > > > + return vq->acked_features & (1ULL << bit);
> > >
> > > Should this hunk go into patch 28?
> >
> > Well, this is needed here since 1 << 32 is not legal C.
> >
> > I can move it - this means patch 28 will have to move earlier
> > in series though.
>
> Yes, I think it makes sense to move patch 28 earlier.
Will do, thanks.
--
MST
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
