From: Benoit Taine <benoit.taine@xxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 17:26:47 +0200 > We should prefer `const struct pci_device_id` over > `DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE` to meet kernel coding style guidelines. > This issue was reported by checkpatch. > > A simplified version of the semantic patch that makes this change is as > follows (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/): > > // <smpl> > > @@ > identifier i; > declarer name DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE; > initializer z; > @@ > > - DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE(i) > + const struct pci_device_id i[] > = z; > > // </smpl> > > I have 103 patches ready, and will only send a few for you to judge if > it is useful enough, and to prevent from spamming too much. I'm fine with this wrt. the networking changes, but I don't think this should be merged via my tree. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
