On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 09:28 -0700, James Bottomley wrote: > On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 17:26 +0200, Benoit Taine wrote: > > We should prefer `const struct pci_device_id` over > > `DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE` to meet kernel coding style guidelines. > > This issue was reported by checkpatch. > > What kernel coding style? checkpatch isn't the arbiter of style, if > that's the only problem. > > The DEFINE_PCI macro was a well reasoned addition when it was added in > 2008. The problem was most people were getting the definition wrong. > When we converted away from CONFIG_HOTPLUG, having this DEFINE_ meant > that only one place needed changing instead of hundreds for PCI tables. > > The reason people were getting the PCI table wrong was mostly the init > section specifiers which are now gone, but it has enough underlying > utility (mostly constification) that I don't think we'd want to churn > the kernel hugely to make a change to struct pci_table and then have to > start detecting and fixing misuses. > > James > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html I would rather fix the misuses of the macro, than remove it. Could we possibly make checkpatch smart enough to tell when the macro is misused? Thanks, Jake _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
