On (Mon) 07 Jul 2014 [11:23:52], Amit Shah wrote: > On (Sun) 06 Jul 2014 [21:41:47], Kees Cook wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 10:34 PM, Amit Shah <amit.shah@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Commit d9e7972619334 "hwrng: add randomness to system from rng sources" > > > added a call to rng_get_data() from the hwrng_register() function. > > > However, some rng devices need initialization before data can be read > > > from them. > > > > > > This commit makes the call to rng_get_data() depend on no init fn > > > pointer being registered by the device. If an init function is > > > registered, this call is made after device init. > > > > Thanks, this seems pretty reasonable. One side-effect is that cycling > > between hwrngs via sysfs (when they have init functions) will cause > > them to add more entropy. I don't think this is a problem, but it is > > kind of a weird side-effect. > > Yes, agreed. Having a per-device bool that indicates whether the > initial randomness is obtained is quite a heavy solution for this > side-effect. But I can put this in the commit log so it's clear.. Well actually this feels a little weird, so how about making this the default behaviour for all devices, whether they have ->init() or not? This also means that if a virtio-rng device is switched, it can contribute as its probe would have been over. Amit _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
