Re: [PATCH net-next v2 4/4] virtio-net: initial debugfs support, export mergeable rx buffer size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 09:19:37PM -0800, Michael Dalton wrote:
> Hi Jason, Michael
> 
> Sorry for the delay in response. Jason, I agree this patch ended up
> being larger than expected. The major implementation parts are:
> (1) Setup directory structure (driver/per-netdev/rx-queue directories)
> (2) Network device renames (optional, so debugfs dir has the right name)
> (3) Support resizing the # of RX queues (optional - we could just export
>     max_queue_pairs files and not delete files if an RX queue is disabled)
> (4) Reference counting - used in case someone opens a debugfs
>     file and then removes the virtio-net device.
> (5) The actual mergeable rx buffer file implementation itself. For now
>     I have added a seqcount for memory safety, but if a read-only race
>     condition is acceptable we could elide the seqcount. FWIW, the
>     seqcount write in receive_mergeable() should, on modern x86,
>     translate to two non-atomic adds and two compiler barriers, so
>     overhead is not expected to be meaningful.
> 
> We can move to sysfs and this would simplify or eliminate much of the
> above, including most of (1) - (4). I believe our choices for what to
> do for the next patchset include:
> (a) Use debugfs as is currently done, removing any optional features
> listed above that are deemed unnecessary.
> 
> (b) Add a per-netdev sysfs attribute group to net_device->sysfs_groups.
> Each attribute would display the mergeable packet buffer size for a given
> RX queue, and there would be max_queue_pairs attributes in total. This
> is already supported by net/core/net-sysfs.c:netdev_register_kobject(),
> but means that we would have a static set of per-RX queue files for
> all RX queues supported by the netdev, rather than dynamically displaying
> only the files corresponding to enabled RX queues (e.g., when # of RX
> queues is changed by  ethtool -L <device>).  For an example of this
> approach, see drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c.
> 
> (c) Modify struct netdev_rx_queue to add virtio-net EWMA fields directly,
> and modify net-sysfs.c to manage the new fields. Unlike (b), this approach
> supports the RX queue resizing in (3) but means putting virtio-net info
> in netdev_rx_queue, which currently has only device-independent fields.

Can't we add struct attribute * to netdevice, and pass that in when
creating the kobj?

> My preference would be (b): try using sysfs and adding a device-specific
> attribute group to the virtio-net netdevice (stored in the existing
> 'sysfs_groups' field and supported by net-sysfs).  This would avoid
> adding virtio-net specific information to net-sysfs. What would you
> prefer (or is there a better way than the approaches above)? Thanks!
> 
> Best,
> 
> Mike
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux