Hi Jason, Michael Sorry for the delay in response. Jason, I agree this patch ended up being larger than expected. The major implementation parts are: (1) Setup directory structure (driver/per-netdev/rx-queue directories) (2) Network device renames (optional, so debugfs dir has the right name) (3) Support resizing the # of RX queues (optional - we could just export max_queue_pairs files and not delete files if an RX queue is disabled) (4) Reference counting - used in case someone opens a debugfs file and then removes the virtio-net device. (5) The actual mergeable rx buffer file implementation itself. For now I have added a seqcount for memory safety, but if a read-only race condition is acceptable we could elide the seqcount. FWIW, the seqcount write in receive_mergeable() should, on modern x86, translate to two non-atomic adds and two compiler barriers, so overhead is not expected to be meaningful. We can move to sysfs and this would simplify or eliminate much of the above, including most of (1) - (4). I believe our choices for what to do for the next patchset include: (a) Use debugfs as is currently done, removing any optional features listed above that are deemed unnecessary. (b) Add a per-netdev sysfs attribute group to net_device->sysfs_groups. Each attribute would display the mergeable packet buffer size for a given RX queue, and there would be max_queue_pairs attributes in total. This is already supported by net/core/net-sysfs.c:netdev_register_kobject(), but means that we would have a static set of per-RX queue files for all RX queues supported by the netdev, rather than dynamically displaying only the files corresponding to enabled RX queues (e.g., when # of RX queues is changed by ethtool -L <device>). For an example of this approach, see drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c. (c) Modify struct netdev_rx_queue to add virtio-net EWMA fields directly, and modify net-sysfs.c to manage the new fields. Unlike (b), this approach supports the RX queue resizing in (3) but means putting virtio-net info in netdev_rx_queue, which currently has only device-independent fields. My preference would be (b): try using sysfs and adding a device-specific attribute group to the virtio-net netdevice (stored in the existing 'sysfs_groups' field and supported by net-sysfs). This would avoid adding virtio-net specific information to net-sysfs. What would you prefer (or is there a better way than the approaches above)? Thanks! Best, Mike _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization