Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Il 04/10/2012 02:11, Rusty Russell ha scritto: >> > > There's a reason I haven't done this. I really, really dislike "my >> > > implemention isn't broken" feature bits. We could have an infinite >> > > number of them, for each bug in each device. >> > >> > However, this bug affects (almost) all implementations and (almost) all >> > devices. It even makes sense to reserve a transport feature bit for it >> > instead of a device feature bit. >> >> Perhaps, but we have to fix the bugs first! > > Yes. :) Isn't that what mst's patch does? > >> As I said, my torture patch broke qemu immediately. Since noone has >> leapt onto fixing that, I'll take a look now... > > I can look at virtio-scsi. Actually, you can't, see my reply to Anthony... Message-ID: <87lifm1y1n.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cheers, Rusty. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
